1. E. Iatan, M. Iliescu, F. Bode, I. Nastase, R.M. Damian, M. Sandu, Numerical study for open-channel flow over rows of hemispheres, Energy Procedia, 85 (2016) 260–265.
  2. F.R. Menter, Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications, AIAA J., 32 (1994) 1598–1605.
  3. S. Edwini-Bonsu, P.M. Steffler, Air flow in sanitary sewer conduits due to wastewater drag: a computational fluid dynamics approach, J. Environ. Eng. Sci., 3 (2004) 331–342.
  4. G. Alfonsi, Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations for turbulence modeling, Appl. Mech. Rev., 62 (2009) 040802.
  5. I. Galambos, Improved Understanding of Performance of Local Controls Linking the above and below Ground Components of Urban Flood Flows, PhD Thesis, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK, 2012.
  6. S. Djordjević, A.J. Saul, G.R. Tabor, J. Blanksby, I. Galambos, N. Sabtu, G. Sailor, Experimental and numerical investigation of interactions between above and below ground drainage systems, Water Sci. Technol., 67 (2012) 535–542.
  7. J. Leandro, P. Lopes, R. Carvalho, P. Páscoa, R. Martins, M. Romagnoli, Numerical and experimental characterization of the 2D vertical average-velocity plane at the center-profile and qualitative air entrainment inside a gully for drainage and reverse flow, Comput. Fluids, 102 (2014) 52–61.
  8. S. Lau, V. Stovin, I. Guymer, Scaling the solute transport characteristics of a surcharged manhole, Urban Water J., 5 (2008) 33–42.
  9. M.P. Allen, D.J. Tildesley, Computer Simulation of Liquids, Clarendon Press, New York, NY, USA, 1987.
  10. M. Balogh, A. Parente, C. Benocci, RANS simulation of ABL flow over complex terrains applying an enhanced k-ε model and wall function formulation: implementation and comparison for fluent and OpenFOAM, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 104–106 (2012) 360–368.
  11. F. Greifzu, C. Kratzsch, T. Forgber, F. Lindner, R. Schwarze, Assessment of particle-tracking models for dispersed particleladen flows implemented in Open FOAM and ANSYS FLUENT, Eng. Appl. Comp. Fluid Mech., 10 (2016) 30–43.
  12. P.K. Kang, W.H. Lee, S.H. Lee, A.S. Kim, Origin of structural parameter inconsistency in forward osmosis models: a porescale CFD study, Desalination, 421 (2017) 47–60.
  13. A.S. Kim, S.J. Ki, H.-J. Kim, Research perspective of membrane distillation: multi-scale and multi-physics phenomena, Desal. Wat. Treat., 58 (2017) 351–359.
  14. A.S. Kim, M.S. Park, J.H. Min, Computational fluid dynamics simulation of Liqui-Cel membrane using OpenFOAM: implication for membrane distillation, Desal. Wat. Treat., 58 (2017) 360–367.
  15. J. Ahrens, B. Geveci, C. Law, ParaView: An End-User Tool for Large Data Visualization, Visualization Handbook, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2005.
  16. U. Ayachit, The ParaView Guide: A Parallel Visualization Application, Kitware Inc., New York, USA, 2015.
  17. H.G. Weller, G. Tabor, H. Jasak, C. Fureby, A tensorial approach to computational continuum mechanics using object-oriented techniques, Comput. Phys., 12 (1998) 620–631.
  18. C.J. Greenshields, OpenFOAM User Guide version 4.0, 2016.
  19. B.E. Launder, D.B. Spalding, The numerical computation of turbulent flows, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 3 (1974) 269–289.
  20. P. Bradshaw, Turbulent secondary flows, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 19 (1987) 53–74.