1. C. Liang, N. de Jonge, P.N. Carvalho, J.L. Nielsen, K. Bester, Biodegradation kinetics of organic micropollutants and microbial community dynamics in a moving bed biofilm reactor, Chem. Eng. J., 415 (2021) 128963,
    doi: 10.1016/j. cej.2021.128963.
  2. E. Zkeri, A. Iliopoulou, A. Katsara, A. Korda, M. Aloupi, G. Gatidou, M.S. Fountoulakis, A.S. Stasinakis, Comparing the use of a two-stage MBBR system with a methanogenic MBBR coupled with a microalgae reactor
    for medium-strength dairy wastewater treatment, Bioresour. Technol., 323 (2021) 124629,
    doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124629.
  3. E. Rikmann, I. Zekker, T. Tenno, A. Saluste, Inoculum-free start-up of biofilm- and sludge-based deammonification systems in pilot scale, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 15 (2018) 133–148.
  4. I. Zekker, O. Artemchuk, E. Rikmann, K. Ohimai, G. Dhar Bhowmick, M. Madhao Ghangrekar, J. Burlakovs, T. Tenno, Start-up of ANAMMOX SBR from non-specific inoculum and process acceleration methods by hydrazine, Water, 13 (2021) 350, doi: 10.3390/w13030350.
  5. I. Zekker, A. Kivirüüt, E. Rikmann, A. Mandel, M. Jaagura, T. Tenno, O. Artemchuk, S. dC Rubin, T. Tenno, Enhanced efficiency of nitritating-ANAMMOX sequencing batch reactor achieved at low decrease rates of oxidation–reduction potential, J. Environ. Eng. Sci., 36 (2019) 0225, doi: 10.1089/ees.2018.0225.
  6. I. Zekker, G.D. Bhowmick, H. Priks, D. Nath, E. Rikmann, M. Jaagura, T. Tenno, K. Tämm, M.M. Ghangrekar, ANAMMOXdenitrification biomass in microbial fuel cell to enhance the electricity generation and nitrogen removal efficiency, Biodegradation, 31 (2020) 249–264.
  7. M. Ahmadi, M. Ahmadmoazzam, R. Saeedi, M. Abtahi, S. Ghafari, S. Jorfi, Biological treatment of a saline and recalcitrant petrochemical wastewater by using a newly isolated halo-tolerant bacterial consortium in MBBR, Desal. Water Treat., 167 (2019) 84–95.
  8. S.A. Osmani, A. Rajpal, A.A. Kazmi, Upgradation of conventional MBBR into Aerobic/Anoxic/Aerobic configuration: a case study of carbon and nitrogen removal based sewage treatment plant, J. Water Process Eng., 40 (2021) 101921, doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.101921.
  9. A. Tsitouras, N. Al-Ghussain, R. Delatolla, Two moving bed biofilm reactors in series for carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorous removal from high organic wastewaters, J. Water Process Eng., 41 (2021) 102088,
    doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102088.
  10. M. Kozak, K. Cirik, S. Başak, Treatment of textile wastewater using combined anaerobic moving bed biofilm reactor and powdered activated carbon-aerobic membrane reactor, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 87 (2021) 105596, doi: 10.1016/j. jece.2021.105596.
  11. M. Zhang, T. Song, C. Zhu, Y. Fan, A. Soares, X. Gu, J. Wu, Roles of nitrate recycling ratio in the A2/O - MBBR denitrifying phosphorus removal system for high-efficient wastewater treatment: Performance comparison, nutrient mechanism and potential evaluation, J. Environ. Manage., 270 (2020) 110887,
    doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110887.
  12. H. Yuan, Y. Li, K. Wang, Effect of influent ammonia nitrogen concentration on microbial community in MBBR reactor, Water Sci. Technol., 83 (2021) 162–172.
  13. M. Seyedsalehi, J. Jaafari, C. Hélix-Nielsen, G. Hodaifa, M. Manshouri, S. Ghadimi, H. Hafizi, H. Barzanouni, Evaluation of moving-bed biofilm sequencing batch reactor (MBSBR) in operating A2O process with emphasis on biological removal of nutrients existing in wastewater, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 15 (2018) 199–206.
  14. J. Jaafari, A.B. Javid, H. Barzanouni, A. Younesi, N.A.A. Farahani, M. Mousazadeh, P. Soleimani, Performance of modified onestage Phoredox reactor with hydraulic up-flow in biological removal of phosphorus from municipal wastewater, Desal. Water Treat., 171 (2019) 216–222.
  15. D. Naghipour, E. Rouhbakhsh, J. Jaafari, Application of the biological reactor with fixed media (IFAS) for removal of organic matter and nutrients in small communities, Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 98 (2020) 1–11.
  16. A. Shitu, G. Liu, Y. Zhang, Z. Ye, J. Zhao, S. Zhu, D. Liu, Enhancement of mariculture wastewater treatment using moving bed biofilm reactors filled with modified biocarriers: characterisation, process performance and microbial community evaluation, J. Environ. Manage., 291 (2021) 112724, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112724.
  17. A. Duyar, V. Ciftcioglu, K. Cirik, G. Civelekoglu, S. Uruş, Treatment of landfill leachate using single-stage anoxic moving bed biofilm reactor and aerobic membrane reactor, Sci. Total Environ., 776 (2021) 145919, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv. 2021.145919.
  18. M.A.S. Hafiz, C. Baumann, J.K. Sher, H. Schönberger, F. Weber, Performance evaluation of anaerobic moving bed bioreactor (An-MBBR) for pretreatment of desizing wastewater, Desal. Water Treat., 181 (2020) 123–130.
  19. A.F.M. Udaiyappan, H.A. Hasan, M.S. Takriff, S.R.S. Abdullah, N.H.M. Yasin, B. Ji, Cultivation and application of Scenedesmus sp. strain UKM9 in palm oil mill effluent treatment for enhanced nutrient removal, J. Cleaner Prod., 294 (2021) 126295, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126295.
  20. E. Edefell, P. Falås, S. Kharel, M. Hagman, M. Christensson, M. Cimbritz, K. Bester, MBBRs as post-treatment to ozonation: degradation of transformation products and ozone-resistant micropollutants, Sci. Total Environ., 754 (2021) 142103, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142103.
  21. A. Mandel, I. Zekker, M. Jaagura, T. Tenno, Enhancement of anoxic phosphorus uptake of denitrifying phosphorus removal process by biomass adaption, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 16 (2019) 5965–5978.
  22. K. Klein, E. Kattel, A. Goi, A. Kivi, N. Dulova, A. Saluste, I. Zekker, M. Trapido, T. Tenno, Combined treatment of pyrogenic wastewater from oil shale retorting, Oil Shale, 34 (2017) 82–96.
  23. R. Shankar, S. Kumar, A.K. Prasad, P. Khare, A.K. Varma, V.K. Yadav, Biological wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) for industrial wastewater, Microbiol. Ecol. Wastewater Treat. Plants, 342 (2021) 193–216.
  24. D. Hosseinlou, Determination of design loading rates for simultaneous anaerobic oxidation/partial
    nitrification– denitrification process and application in treating dairy industry effluent, J. Environ. Chem. Eng.,
    9 (2021) 105176, doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105176.
  25. Y. Achour, L. Bahsis, E.-H. Ablouh, H. Yazid, M.R. Laamari, M. El Haddad, Insight into adsorption mechanism of Congo red dye onto Bombax Buonopozense bark activated-carbon using central composite design and DFT studies, Surf. Interfaces, 23 (2021) 100977, doi: 10.1016/j.surfin.2021.100977.
  26. T.M. Laid, K. Abdelhamid, L.S. Eddine, B. Abderrhmane, Optimizing the biosynthesis parameters of iron oxide nanoparticles using central composite design, J. Biomol. Struct., 1229 (2021) 129497, doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.129497.
  27. F. Jiang, M. Zhang, X. Yang, X. Zeng, Z. Liang, D. Li, Research on optimization design of dual derrick for offshore platform based on RSM, IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., 440 (2020) 052049.
  28. N. Rezania, M.H. Zonoozi, M. Saadatpour, Coagulationflocculation of turbid water using graphene oxide: simulation through response surface methodology and process characterization, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 28 (2021) 14812–14827.
  29. Y. Li, C. Liu, L. Zhang, B. Sun, A partition optimization design method for a regional integrated energy system based on a clustering algorithm, Energy, 219 (2021) 119562, doi: 10.1016/j. energy.2020.119562.
  30. A.B. Jasni, H. Kamyab, S. Chelliapan, N. Arumugam, S. Krishnan, M.F.M. Din, Treatment of wastewater using response surface methodology: a brief review, Chem. Eng. Trans., 78 (2020) 535–540.
  31. P. Xiao, J. Zhou, X. Luo, B. Kang, L. Guo, G. Yuan, L. Zhang, T. Zhao, Enhanced nitrogen removal from high-strength ammonium wastewater by improving heterotrophic nitrification-aerobic denitrification process: insight into the influence of dissolved oxygen in the outer layer of the biofilm, J. Cleaner Prod., 297 (2021) 126658, doi: 10.1016/j. jclepro.2021.126658.
  32. I.D. Boateng, X.-M. Yang, Process optimization of intermediatewave infrared drying: screening by Plackett–Burman; comparison of Box–Behnken and central composite design and evaluation: a case study, Ind. Crops Prod., 162 (2021) 113287, doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113287.
  33. I. Zekker, M. Raudkivi, O. Artemchuk, E. Rikmann, H. Priks, M. Jaagura, T. Tenno, Mainstream-sidestream wastewater switching promotes ANAMMOX nitrogen removal rate in organic-rich, low-temperature streams, Environ. Technol., 34 (2020) 1–10.
  34. E. Rikmann, I. Zekker, M. Tomingas, P. Vabamäe, K. Kroon, A. Saluste, T. Tenno, A. Menert, L. Loorits, S.S. dC Rubin, Comparison of sulfate-reducing and conventional ANAMMOX upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors, J. Biosci. Bioeng., 118 (2014) 426–433.
  35. A. di Biase, M.S. Kowalski, T.R. Devlin, J.A. Oleszkiewicz, Moving bed biofilm reactor technology in municipal wastewater treatment: a review, J. Environ. Manage., 247 (2019) 849–866.
  36. R.K. Sonwani, G. Swain, B.S. Giri, R.S. Singh, B.N. Rai, A novel comparative study of modified carriers in moving bed biofilm reactor for the treatment of wastewater: process optimization and kinetic study, Bioresour. Technol., 281 (2019) 335–342.
  37. A.D. Santos, R.C. Martins, R.M. Quinta-Ferreira, L.M. Castro, Moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) for dairy wastewater treatment, Energy Rep., 6 (2020) 340–344.
  38. K. Tang, P. Rosborg, E.S. Rasmussen, A. Hambly, M. Madsen, N.M. Jensen, A.A. Hansen, C. Sund, H.G. Andersen, E. Torresi, C. Kragelund, H.R. Andersen, Impact of intermittent feeding on polishing of micropollutants by moving bed biofilm reactors (MBBR), J. Hazard. Mater., 403 (2021) 123536, doi: 10.1016/j. jhazmat.2020.123536.
  39. X. Chen, Q. Zhang, Y. Zhu, T. Zhao, Response of wastewater treatment performance, microbial composition and functional genes to different C/N ratios and carrier types in MBBR inoculated with heterotrophic
    nitrification-aerobic denitrification bacteria, Bioresour. Technol., 42 (2021) 125339,
    doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125339.
  40. M. Xu, W. Zhou, X. Chen, Y. Zhou, B. He, S. Tan, Analysis of the biodegradation performance and biofouling in a halophilic MBBR-MBR to improve the treatment of disinfected saline wastewater, Chemosphere, 269 (2021) 128716, doi: 10.1016/j. chemosphere.2020.128716.
  41. X. Cao, N. Ren, G. Tian, Y. Fan, Q. Duan, A three-dimensional prediction method of dissolved oxygen in pond culture based on Attention-GRU-GBRT, Comput. Electron. Agric., 181 (2021) 105955, doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105955.
  42. T. Tenno, K. Uiga, A. Mashirin, I. Zekker, E. Rikmann, Modeling closed equilibrium systems of H2O–dissolved CO2–solid CaCO3, J. Phys. Chem., 121 (2017) 3094–3100.
  43. T. Tenno, E. Rikmann, K. Uiga, I. Zekker, A. Mashirin, T. Tenno, A novel proton transfer model of the closed equilibrium system H2O–CO2–CaCO3–NHX, Proc. Est. Acad. Sci., 67 (2018) 260–270.
  44. M. Zhang, J. Gao, Y. Fan, Q. Liu, C. Zhu, L. Ge, C. He, J. Wu, Comparisons of nitrite accumulation, microbial behavior and nitrification kinetic in continuous stirred tank (ST) and plug flow (PF) moving bed biofilm reactors, Chemosphere, 278 (2021) 130410, doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130410.
  45. A.C. Affam, W.C. Chung, P.L. Lau, O.A. Johnson, K.C. Seong, L. Baloo, B.W.L. Peng, F. Xınru, Design Expert Application for Optimization of Ag/AgBr/TiO2 Visible Light Photocatalyst Preparation, B.S. Mohammed, N. Shafiq,
    M. Rahman, S. Kutty, H. Mohamad, A.L. Balogun, Eds., Proceedings of the International Conference on Civil, Offshore and Environmental Engineering, ICCOEE 2021: ICCOEE2020, Vol. 132, Springer, Singapore, 2021,
    pp. 93–102.
  46. S.J.S. Chelladurai, K. Murugan, A.P. Ray, M. Upadhyaya, V. Narasimharaj, S. Gnanasekaran, Optimization of process parameters using response surface methodology: a review, Mater. Today Proc., 37 (2021) 1301–1304.
  47. J. Jaafari, H. Barzanouni, S. Mazloomi, N.A.A. Farahani, K. Sharafi, P. Soleimani, G.A. Haghighat, Effective adsorptive removal of reactive dyes by magnetic chitosan nanoparticles: kinetic, isothermal studies and response surface methodology, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 164 (2020) 344–355.
  48. S.I. Gadow, Y.-Y. Li, Development of an integrated anaerobic/aerobic bioreactor for biodegradation of recalcitrant azo dye and bioenergy recovery: HRT effects and functional resilience, Bioresour. Technol. Rep., 9 (2020) 100388, doi: 10.1016/j. biteb.2020.100388.
  49. A.B. Fanta, A.M. Nair, S. Sægrov, S.W. Østerhus, Phosphorus removal from industrial discharge impacted municipal wastewater using sequencing batch moving bed biofilm reactor, J. Water Process Eng., 41 (2021) 102034, doi: 10.1016/j. jwpe.2021.102034.
  50. A. Dargahi, R. Shokoohi, G. Asgari, A. Ansari, D. Nematollahi, M.R. Samarghandi, Moving-bed biofilm reactor combined with three-dimensional electrochemical pretreatment (MBBR–3DE) for 2,4-D herbicide treatment: application for real wastewater, improvement of biodegradability, RSC Adv., 11 (2021) 9608–9620.
  51. L. Daija, A. Selberg, E. Rikmann, I. Zekker, T. Tenno, T. Tenno, The influence of lower temperature, influent fluctuations and long retention time on the performance of an upflow mode laboratory-scale septic tank, Desal. Water Treat., 57 (2016) 18679–18687.
  52. A. Micek, K. Jóźwiakowski, M. Marzec, A. Listosz, T. Grabowski, Efficiency and technological reliability of contaminant removal in household WWTPs with activated sludge, Appl. Sci., 11 (2021) 1889, doi: 10.3390/app11041889.
  53. G. Xu, Z. Zhang, F. Gao, Effect of COD/N ratios and DO concentrations on the NOB suppression in a multi-cycle SBR, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 9 (2021) 105735, doi: 10.1016/j. jece.2021.105735.
  54. A.M. Abdelkader, Comparative study between membrane bioreactor MBR and rotating biological contactors RBC for greywater treatment, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Dev., 12 (2021) 107–111.