1. C. Visvanathan, R.B. Aim, K. Parameshwaran, Membrane separation bioreactors for wastewater treatment, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 30 (2000) 1–48.
  2. S.H. Yoon, Important operational parameters of membrane bioreactor-sludge disintegration (MBR-SD) system for zero excess sludge production, Water Res., 37 (2003) 1921–1931.
  3. W. Yang, N. Cicek, J. Ilg, State-of-the-art of membrane bioreactors: worldwide research and commercial applications in North America, J. Membr. Sci., 270 (2006) 201–211.
  4. P. Krzeminski, L. Leverette, S. Malamis, E. Katsou, Membrane bioreactors – a review on recent developments in energy reduction, fouling control, novel configurations, LCA and market prospects, J. Membr. Sci., 527 (2017) 207–227.
  5. W.T. Zhao, X. Huang, D.J. Lee, Enhanced treatment of coke plant wastewater using an anaerobic–anoxic–oxic membrane bioreactor system, Sep. Purif. Technol., 66 (2009) 279–286.
  6. S. Ittisupornrat, T. Tobino, K. Yamamoto, Effect of sludge retention time on inclined plate function, treatment performance and sludge characteristics of inclined plate membrane bioreactors treating municipal wastewater, Water Environ. J., 29 (2015) 346–352.
  7. S. Malamis, A. Andreadakis, D. Mamais, C. Noutsopoulos, Investigation of long-term operation and biomass activity in a membrane bioreactor system, Water Sci. Technol., 63 (2011) 1906–1912.
  8. T.H. Bae, S.S. Han, T.M. Tak, Membrane sequencing batch reactor system for the treatment of dairy industry wastewater, Process Biochem., 39 (2003) 221–231.
  9. J. Krampe, K. Krauth, Sequencing batch reactor with submerged hollow fibre membranes for the biomass separation, Water Sci. Technol., 43 (2001) 195–199.
  10. I.J. Kang, C.H. Lee, K.J. Kim, Characteristics of microfiltration membranes in a membrane coupled sequencing batch reactor system, Water Res., 37 (2003) 1192–1197.
  11. M. Badiei, J.M. Jahim, N. Anuar, S.R. Sheikh Abdullah, Effect of hydraulic retention time on biohydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent in anaerobic sequencing batch reactor, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 36 (2011) 5912–5919.
  12. S.N. Sin, H. Chua, W. Lo, P.H.F. Yu, Effects of trace levels of copper, chromium, and zinc ions on the performance of activated sludge, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 84–86 (2000) 487–500.
  13. F. Kargi, A. Uygur, Hydraulic residence time effects in biological nutrient removal using five-step sequencing batch reactor, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 35 (2004) 167–172.
  14. J. Boonnorat, S. Techkarnjanaruk, R. Honda, P. Prachanurak, Effects of hydraulic retention time and carbon to nitrogen ratio on micro-pollutant biodegradation in membrane bioreactor for leachate treatment, Bioresource Technol., 219 (2016) 53–63.
  15. T.T. Win, H. Kim, K. Cho, K.G. Song, J. Park, Monitoring the microbial community shift throughout the shock changes of hydraulic retention time in an anaerobic moving bed membrane bioreactor, Bioresour. Technol., 202 (2016) 125–132.
  16. P.E. Poh, M.F. Chong, Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket-hollow centered packed bed (UASB-HCPB) reactor for thermophilic palm oil mill effluent (POME) treatment, Biomass Bioenergy, 67 (2014) 231–242.
  17. M. Bayat, M.R. Mehrnia, M. Hosseinzadeh, R. Sheikh-Sofla, Petrochemical wastewater treatment and reuse by MBR: a pilot study for ethylene oxide/ethylene glycol and olefin units, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 25 (2016) 265–271.
  18. L. Deng, W. Guo, H.H. Ngo, B. Du, Q. Wei, N.H. Tran, N.C. Nguyen, S.S. Chen, J. Li, Effects of hydraulic retention time and bioflocculant addition on membrane fouling in a spongesubmerged membrane bioreactor, Bioresour. Technol., 210 (2015) 11–17.
  19. J. Xue, Y. Zhang, Y. Liu, M. Gamal El-Din, Effects of ozone pretreatment and operating conditions on membrane fouling behaviors of an anoxic-aerobic membrane bioreactor for oil sands process-affected water (OSPW) treatment, Water Res., 105 (2016) 444–455.
  20. K.K. Ng, X. Shi, S.L. Ong, C.F. Lin, H.Y. Ng, An innovative of aerobic bio-entrapped salt marsh sediment membrane reactor for the treatment of high-saline pharmaceutical wastewater, Chem. Eng. J., 295 (2016) 317–325.
  21. Z. Huang, S.L. Ong, H.Y. Ng, Submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor for low-strength wastewater treatment: effect of HRT and SRT on treatment performance and membrane fouling, Water Res., 45 (2011) 705–713.
  22. R. Scheumann, M. Kraume, Influence of hydraulic retention time on the operation of a submerged membrane sequencing batch reactor (SM-SBR) for the treatment of greywater, Desalination, 246 (2009) 444–451.
  23. S.R.P. Shariati, B. Bonakdarpour, N. Zare, F.Z. Ashtiani, The effect of hydraulic retention time on the performance and fouling characteristics of membrane sequencing batch reactors used for the treatment of synthetic petroleum refinery wastewater, Bioresour. Technol., 102 (2011) 7692–7699.
  24. APHA, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed., American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C., USA, 1998.
  25. W. Wang, Q. Yang, S. Zheng, D. Wu, Anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) for bamboo industry wastewater treatment, Bioresour. Technol., 149 (2013) 292–300.
  26. L.B. Chu, F.L. Yang, X.W. Zhang, Anaerobic treatment of domestic wastewater in a membrane-coupled expended granular sludge bed (EGSB) reactor under moderate to low temperature, Process Biochem., 40 (2005) 1063–1070.
  27. K.K. Ng, X. Shi, Y. Yao, H.Y. Ng, Bio-entrapped membrane reactor and salt marsh sediment membrane bioreactor for the treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater: treatment performance and microbial communities, Bioresour. Technol., 171 (2014) 265–273.
  28. K.G. Song, J. Cho, K.W. Cho, S.D. Kim, K.H. Ahn, Characteristics of simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorus removal in a pilotscale sequencing anoxic/anaerobic membrane bioreactor at various conditions, Desalination, 250 (2010) 801–804.
  29. X. Wu, J. Zhu, Simultaneous removal of nutrients from milking parlor wastewater using an AO2 sequencing batch reactor (SBR) system, J. Environ. Sci. Health., Part A, 50 (2015) 396–405.
  30. J. Mouthon-Bello, H. Zhou, Performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor system for biological nutrient removal, Water Environ. Res., 78 (2006) 538–547.
  31. There are 24 thousand businesses in Turkey with 50 head and over animals, Farm Journal, 2012. Available at: (Accessed August 2016).
  32. Table 5.15: Water Pollution Regulation, Official Gazette of the Republic of Turkey, number: 25687, 2004.
  33. O.T. Komesli, M. Muz, S. Ak, C.F. Gökçay, Prolonged reuse of domestic wastewater after membrane bioreactor treatment, Desal. Wat. Treat., 53 (2014) 1–8.
  34. G. Qiu, Y.M. Law, S. Das, Y.P. Ting, Direct and complete phosphorus recovery from municipal wastewater using a hybrid microfiltration-forward osmosis membrane bioreactor process with seawater brine as draw solution, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49 (2015) 6156–6163.
  35. M. El-Fadel, J. Hashisho, A comparative examination of MBR and SBR performance for the treatment of high-strength landfill leachate, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 64 (2014) 1073–1084.